Time For 007

James Bond movie musings. 007 words, 007 sentences. Twice daily at 10:07 AM/PM UTC.

Should actual stunts take priority over CGI?

I’m firmly in the camp that wants Bond 26 to prioritize practical stunt work whenever possible. Casino Royale‘s record-setting Aston Martin rollover remains an all-time action moment precisely because it was real, while Spectre‘s massive desert explosion showed the impact practical effects can still have on screen. Practical stunts also tend to age far better, giving action scenes a certain authenticity that is difficult to replicate digitally. No Time to Die certainly looked impressive, but as was outlined in a recent r/JamesBond reddit thread on the subject, the amount of special effects work that supplemented many sequences beyond the stunts themselves was surprising.

With director Denis Villeneuve coming off the visually spectacular Dune films, it’ll be interesting to see whether he leans further into digital spectacle or lets practical sequences take center stage. Or will writer Steven Knight steer Bond 26 toward a more character-driven, Peaky Blinders-esque statement piece with minimal fanfare?

On This Day…

All other July 14th posts

July 14, 2026 – 10:07 PM UTC

Morton Slumber of Slumber, Inc. comes across more like a smooth-talking car salesman than a funeral director. As Bond, posing as Peter Franks, attends his “brother’s” cremation, Slumber delivers a polished routine complete with rehearsed condolences, dramatic curtains, and an oddly theatrical ceremony that feels more transactional than heartfelt. He even cuts off the angelic…

July 14, 2025 – 10:07 PM UTC

There are too many camera edits, Laz has an odd speaking tone and the female obsequiousness is just too much.  And Bond has never sounded more pretentious.